Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
0:35
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
454.3K views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
Income inequality isn’t the problem. Political power over income is.When the state can pick winners and losers, inequality becomes weaponized. That’s the system socialism requires.In a system grounded in property rights, wealth comes from value creation and voluntary trade, not political favor. No one has the power to seize from one group to reward another.And that’s the part they skip: their “solution” doesn’t lift people up, it levels them down. It can’t create wealth, only redistribute and er
0:28
Income inequality isn’t the problem. Political power over income is.When the state can pick winners and losers, inequality becomes weaponized. That’s the system socialism requires.In a system grounded in property rights, wealth comes from value creation and voluntary trade, not political favor. No one has the power to seize from one group to reward another.And that’s the part they skip: their “solution” doesn’t lift people up, it levels them down. It can’t create wealth, only redistribute and er
3.9K views6 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
"Tackling wealth inequality" too often means preferring equal poverty to unequal prosperity. They'd rather everyone get poorer together than richer at different speeds.There is a peculiar sort of reformer who cannot bear the sight of one man climbing higher, even if everyone else is climbing too. He'd rather saw off the top of the ladder than build a second one. He mistakes equality for prosperity, and leaves the country with neither.
1:26
"Tackling wealth inequality" too often means preferring equal poverty to unequal prosperity. They'd rather everyone get poorer together than richer at different speeds.There is a peculiar sort of reformer who cannot bear the sight of one man climbing higher, even if everyone else is climbing too. He'd rather saw off the top of the ladder than build a second one. He mistakes equality for prosperity, and leaves the country with neither.
3.3K views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
This assumes wealth is a fixed pie.If one billionaire becomes ten billionaires, it doesn't follow that everyone else became poorer.That's like arguing that because there are more professional athletes than in 1990, everyone else must be worse at sports.
0:30
This assumes wealth is a fixed pie.If one billionaire becomes ten billionaires, it doesn't follow that everyone else became poorer.That's like arguing that because there are more professional athletes than in 1990, everyone else must be worse at sports.
2.3K views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
The flaw in this argument is assuming greed disappears when you replace voluntary trade with political power. If people are too selfish to be trusted with freedom, why trust them with government? Capitalism is the only system that lets you say no. Communism abolishes that protection.
0:29
The flaw in this argument is assuming greed disappears when you replace voluntary trade with political power. If people are too selfish to be trusted with freedom, why trust them with government? Capitalism is the only system that lets you say no. Communism abolishes that protection.
1.8K views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
Governments have been promising that one more tax on one more group will solve poverty for thousands of years.The taxes keep coming.Poverty doesn't seem nearly as cooperative.
1:13
Governments have been promising that one more tax on one more group will solve poverty for thousands of years.The taxes keep coming.Poverty doesn't seem nearly as cooperative.
960 views5 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
0:34
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
293K views5 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:54
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
1.4M views6 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:13
So let me get this straight.A millionaire who became wealthy through trading and finance is now telling ordinary people that they are not going to "trade their way out of this," that upward mobility is largely impossible, and that the real problem is people with even more money than he has.Conveniently, the villain is always someone richer.
1.1K views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
2:38
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
486.3K views5 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:55
If it were truly cheaper, it wouldn’t need to be “doubled down” by the government.Markets adopt cheaper options on their own because people have every incentive to save money.When the state has to push, subsidize, and mandate, that’s a signal, not proof. It means the price isn’t competitive on its own.Calling something cheaper while requiring intervention to force adoption is the contradiction.
3.5K views6 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
3:51
The solution to every government failure is apparently the same: seize more income, redistribute more wealth, and treat productive people as tax livestock.Every promise was made with previous funding. Every failure is blamed on a lack of new funding.The program isn't failing because the rich paid too little. It's failing because politicians spent decades promising more than they could deliver.
434 views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
2:18
Free speech isn’t a weapon of war. It’s a weapon against tyranny.The moment you treat speech as something dangerous that must be controlled, you’ve already conceded the core principle, that individuals can’t be trusted to think and judge for themselves.Yes, speech can be misused. So can anything human. But the alternative isn’t safety, it’s authority deciding what you’re allowed to say, hear, and believe.That’s control, not protection.
54.3K views7 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand🤑
0:28
By that standard, it’s better to make the rich poorer even if it leaves the poor worse off.That’s not about lifting anyone, it’s about taking from producers, routing it through politics, and creating dependence so power expands.A free system isn’t equal in outcomes.The rich may often get richer faster, but the poor still rise, with the freedom and opportunity to become anything, even the richest of the rich.
8.5K views6 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand🤑
0:24
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
867 views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:40
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
158K views5 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:16
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
180.1K views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:37
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
189.4K views7 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:27
Bernie thinks the problem is that some people have too much.The real problem is that he thinks that gives him a claim on what they've earned.His entire philosophy boils down to this: inequality is a greater evil than coercion.If one man creates more wealth than millions of others, Bernie sees a crime that must be corrected. Not because anyone's rights were violated, but because the outcome offends his sense of fairness.That's why the solution is always the same: confiscate, redistribute, and han
4.3K views5 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:07
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
2.4M views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:37
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
270.7K views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:12
They're proudly demonstrating voluntary cooperation while arguing for a system built on compulsory redistribution. Ironically, this project looks far more like capitalism than communism.
953 views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:34
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
304.7K views8 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:52
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
53.5K views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:14
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
49K views3 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
0:59
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
3.9M views7 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
2:34
This company is too big and powerful, so let's give more power to the only institution that's bigger, more powerful, and doesn't face competition that you can't opt out of, can't compete with, and can't refuse to fund.They are preying on ignorance, envy and resentment.
4.1K views4 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
3:00
Calling it ‘preserving democracy’ while advocating selective confiscation is a strange way of saying ‘majority rule over minority rights.
2.1K views7 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand🤑
1:27
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
187.2K views7 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
1:24
Rock Chartrand (@RockChartrand) on X
137K views2 months ago
x.comRock Chartrand
See more
Static thumbnail place holder